How do I run the test?
- On your phone or computer, open PageSpeed Insights, Google's free speed checker.
- Paste your home page address and press Analyze.
- Stay on the Mobile tab. It's the harder test, and it's how anyone looking you up from a truck or a parking lot sees you.
- Find Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). It's how long it takes for the biggest thing on the screen, usually your top photo or headline, to show up.
That's the 60 seconds. Write the number down with the date, because it changes.
What number should I be looking for?
Google's guide to LCP says sites "should strive to have Largest Contentful Paint of 2.5 seconds or less." The PageSpeed Insights documentation sorts it into three buckets:
| LCP on mobile | Google's label |
|---|---|
| 2.5 seconds or less | Good |
| 2.5 to 4 seconds | Needs improvement |
| Over 4 seconds | Poor |
You may see two sets of numbers. The top set, when it appears, is real visitor data from Chrome users over the last 28 days. Small local sites often don't have enough visitors for it, so you'll only see the lower set, a lab test Google runs on the spot. Both are useful. The lab number is the one you can check again right after a fix.
Don't worry much about the big score out of 100. It moves around. When we tested 21 sites three times each on October 5, one home page scored 35 on one run and 75 on the next two. LCP in seconds is the steadier thing to watch.
Does a few seconds really matter?
For someone standing in a parking lot trying to find your number, yes. Google's web.dev guide (last updated November 2023) points to the BBC, which found it lost an additional 10% of users for every extra second its site took to load. That's a big national site, not a Grand Valley shop, so treat it as a direction, not a forecast. But the direction is clear: the slower the page, the more people give up.
How do the local web design firms' own sites do?
On the afternoon of October 8, 2026, we ran the same mobile test (Lighthouse, three runs each) on the home pages of 20 web design and marketing firms that market to Grand Junction businesses. These are the people building a lot of the valley's websites. 17 of the 20 home pages had an LCP over 4 seconds. The middle result was about 12 seconds. We're not naming anyone. Sites change, and one afternoon's test on one network is a snapshot, not a verdict.
We tested our own site the same way. When we first ran it, on the evening of October 5, it wasn't great either: 4.4 seconds, which is in the poor bucket. We kept working on it. On October 8, the same Lighthouse test gave our home page 3.5, 2.0 and 3.6 seconds across three runs. The same day, Google's PageSpeed Insights showed 2.2 seconds on its Mobile tab, which is "good." One good run isn't a finish line, so we'll keep checking.